Latest modern slavery fight updates - FreedomUnited.org

Are Private Prison Companies Using Forced Labor?

  • Published on
    November 8, 2017
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Forced Labor
Hero Banner

Next week the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver is due to hear arguments in a major case where current and former detainees are suing Geo Group Inc., one of the largest U.S. private prison companies, for violating federal anti-trafficking laws by coercing them to work for free under threat of solitary confinement. The case has potential to change the future of the $5 billion private prison industry.

Bloomberg reports:

The case was first filed in 2014 by a group of immigrants who had been detained at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility run by Geo in Aurora, Colo. Their key claim rests on the assertion that Geo violated the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, a law designed to stop human trafficking—a scourge many associate with sexual exploitation by gangs, not with government contractors’ treatment of detained immigrants. Their lawsuit argues that Geo violated the law’s prohibition on using threats to obtain labor.

“It would be forced labor for someone to say, ‘We’ll arrest you for not working for me,’” says David Seligman, who represents the plaintiffs. “It’s similarly forced labor to say, ‘We’re going to remove you from all contact with other people.’”

Geo Group rejects all claims made against them, calling the trafficking charge “absurd” because “the anti-trafficking law wasn’t meant to apply to federal detainees who are lawfully kept in the custody of the government.” Geo says this cases poses major risks to them as a company in their ability to honor contracts with the US government.

If the plaintiffs win, other private prison companies that use inmate labor will come under pressure to reform. The private prison industry has grown tremendously in recent years as a means to make money. “There is, almost by definition, a focus on maximizing profits and shareholder value at any publicly held private business,” says David Lopez, who will argue for the plaintiffs before the 10th Circuit.

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Annamarie Jones
7 years ago

I sure hope the 10th Circuit rules in the plaintiffs’ favor. It is only common decency that you pay a person a fair wage for their work. I hope the facts show that they are not being detained for the purpose of forced labor.

This week

European Union finally says “no” to products made with forced labor

In a decisive step towards cleaning up supply-chains, the European Union has approved a law forbidding the sale of products made with forced labor. As reported by Human Rights Watch (HRW), the law will help combat labor abuse and hold companies to account.   Big profits that lead to a big problem  According to the ILO Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), forced labor is "all work or service which is exacted from any person under the threat of a

| Tuesday November 19, 2024

Read more