Latest modern slavery fight updates - FreedomUnited.org

Indian factory workers supplying major brands allege routine exploitation

  • Published on
    November 20, 2020
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Supply Chain
Hero Banner

A BBC investigation this week uncovered claims of exploitation made by Indian factory workers that supply British supermarket chains Sainsbury’s, Tesco, and Marks and Spencer, as well as fashion brand Ralph Lauren.

Women working at these factories report that they are made to work continuously, often through the night, and are not afforded time to use the toilet, eat lunch or even drink water on shift.

“They ask us to work so late I can’t even feed my children at night. They shouldn’t treat us like slaves, they should give us respect.”

The women argue they would not endure these conditions if employed directly by the brands in the U.K., where they would be deemed unacceptable.

The monthly living wage for garment workers working in the region is at minimum Rs. 18,727 (US$250), but more than 40 percent of workers surveyed by Action Aid India reported that their average monthly income was in the range of Rs. 2000-5000 (US$26-66).

India has long been an attractive place for foreign brands to outsource work due to low wages, weak labor laws, and the fact that unions are virtually non-existent in the private sector, making informal and contract workers especially vulnerable.

While the claims made by the women working in these factories violate India’s Factories Act, which states that no worker should exceed more than 48 hours a week nor work more than 9 hours a day, the BBC reports that rampant corruption and a sluggish system has meant that factories are rarely held to account for breaking the law.

While the brands named in the investigation do not own or operate the factories facing these allegations, they are ultimately responsible for the conditions these workers are experiencing.

As one owner of a clothing supplier explained:

“It’s the brand who wants to maximize the profit. So, they push you to a level wherein you have to do the exploitation in order to survive…the factory is aware when the auditors are coming, so they keep everything in perfect condition before…the moment the audit is over, everything goes back to normal, which means exploitation and non-compliance. It is the way of working in the textile industry, it’s just not India, it’s everywhere.”

The four brands supplied by the factories included in the investigation all said they were concerned about the allegations uncovered by the BBC and would investigate.

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john mascarenhas
john mascarenhas
3 years ago

what a shame! i thought that india had good labour laws. why are these poor workers not covered by labour unions??? the companies who contract these factories should be shamed into owning that their clothes are stained with blood and sweat of the poor women!

This week

European Union finally says “no” to products made with forced labor

In a decisive step towards cleaning up supply-chains, the European Union has approved a law forbidding the sale of products made with forced labor. As reported by Human Rights Watch (HRW), the law will help combat labor abuse and hold companies to account.   Big profits that lead to a big problem  According to the ILO Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), forced labor is "all work or service which is exacted from any person under the threat of a

| Tuesday November 19, 2024

Read more